<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Olivia's Digital History Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oliviadmeyer.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oliviadmeyer.info</link>
	<description>Using Technology for Good Instead of Evil</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Embracing Textspeak by Mel</title>
		<link>http://oliviadmeyer.info/2009/06/13/31/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oliviadmeyer.info/?p=31#comment-4</guid>
		<description>IMHO, FTW :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, FTW <img src='http://oliviadmeyer.info/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Embracing Textspeak by Jeremy Boggs</title>
		<link>http://oliviadmeyer.info/2009/06/13/31/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Boggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oliviadmeyer.info/?p=31#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I've often wondered if the increasing blur between work and non-work boundaries is contributing to this kind of acceptance about informal communication. I don't think you should get over your pet peeve; I think different media for communication bring with it different expectations for both writer and reader, and really depend on the kind of relationship you already have with a reader (or want to build). 

Email is a weird thing. I've noticed that the first email is usually the most formal--it includes a salutation, usually good grammar, paragraph structure, and a closing signature.  As the thread progresses, these conventions break down, to the point that the last message could consist of one word, with no greeting or signature. I notice this with more regularity the last year or so, at least to email I send/receive. I tend to think its a result of that blurring I mention above...email seems torn between the formalities of letter writing and the short, instant, informal nature of instant messenger and txting.

IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often wondered if the increasing blur between work and non-work boundaries is contributing to this kind of acceptance about informal communication. I don&#8217;t think you should get over your pet peeve; I think different media for communication bring with it different expectations for both writer and reader, and really depend on the kind of relationship you already have with a reader (or want to build). </p>
<p>Email is a weird thing. I&#8217;ve noticed that the first email is usually the most formal&#8211;it includes a salutation, usually good grammar, paragraph structure, and a closing signature.  As the thread progresses, these conventions break down, to the point that the last message could consist of one word, with no greeting or signature. I notice this with more regularity the last year or so, at least to email I send/receive. I tend to think its a result of that blurring I mention above&#8230;email seems torn between the formalities of letter writing and the short, instant, informal nature of instant messenger and txting.</p>
<p>IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
